An Old War Dogs Satellite Site


Wednesday, 15 August 2007
 

This summer's must read

Lone Survivor - Top Reading Choice of the Summer
George "Rurik" Mellinger

xxxx
xxx

xxx
xxxx

A military mission gone horribly wrong, resulting in a bloody struggle against overwhelming odds, is a common enough tale. But Lone Survivor by Marcus Luttrell with Patrick Robinson (Little, Brown 2007) is a rare example of the genre. Defeat, and escape from complete catastrophe are not the usual subjects for uplift and inspiration. And in any case, I usually detest “uplift and inspiration” as nonsense for the weak-spined needing continual bracing. But this book inspires anyway, perhaps because it is not intended to be “inspirational”. You may read Lone Survivor as an inspiring adventure of a warrior battling against odds and numbers too great, and somehow surviving. But if you read it only as an adventure tale, you will have missed the author’s purpose and his deeper message.

It would be easy to make such a mistake. The first two chapters got off to a very slow and awkward start for me. The tone was excessively conversational. With nary a complete sentence. Just fragments. And lots of slang usage. Disjointed, you understand. And disorganized. Like this.  And everything seemingly exaggerated. Marcus’ boasting, and his eulogies to his friends, now dead, which seemed to rise to the level of hagiography.

With the third chapter, the tenor of the book completely changed, and the story became far more focused, tighter and better organized. In this, and the following chapters, Marcus Luttrell describes the gritty path which led to becoming a SEAL. This enthralled me, and illuminated much of the boasting which had gone before, and also the determination which was to follow. The training is always stressful and brutal in any of the military’s voluntary programs, Officer Candidate School (which this reviewer tried unsuccessfully), Airborne, Ranger or Special Forces, or SEALs. Luttrell maintains that SEAL training is the toughest of all, and reading his description, I’m quite prepared to believe him. Every branch of every service convinces itself that they are an elite, better and tougher than all the others, believing the same thing. But the SEALs seem to have the bragging rights. This hundred and twenty pages, by itself would be an excellent lesson for anyone who has never done military service, what it means to become a warrior, and why they do it. ...

Read the whole thing here.

Contributed by Bill Faith on August 15, 2007 at 12:05 AM in Afghanistan, Books, The American Warrior, US Navy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Wednesday, 20 June 2007
 

2007.06.20 Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan Roundup

30 Al Qaeda Fighters Killed in Iraq

BAGHDAD —  Thousands of U.S. and Iraqi troops pressed forward for the second day Wednesday with an operation aimed at clearing out a Sunni insurgent stronghold northeast of Baghdad. The U.S. military said at least 30 Al Qaeda fighters were killed and several bombs and weapons caches destroyed as the soldiers fought their way through the streets of Baqouba.

The U.S. military operation that involves some 10,000 American soldiers in Diyala province, an Al Qaeda bastion to the north and east of Baghdad, matched in size the force that American generals sent against the insurgent-held city of Fallujah 2 1/2 years ago. By late Tuesday, the military had reported only one American death, a Task Force Lightning soldier killed by an explosion near his vehicle. ...

Below the fold:

  • U.S.-Iraqi offensive yields results

See also:

U.S.-Iraqi offensive yields results 
A major thrust in Diyala province, which began Tuesday, has left at least 30 suspected insurgents dead and uncovered 1,000 roadside bombs.

BAGHDAD -- At least 30 suspected insurgents have been killed in two days of operations being conducted in Diyala province as part of a major thrust by U.S. and Iraqi forces to clear Al Qaeda operatives from the region, the military said today.

Soldiers conducting Operation Arrowhead Thunder also have uncovered more than 1,000 roadside bombs around the provincial capital, Baqubah, where the offensive is being conducted, Iraqi security officials said.

Local residents reported heavy fighting in some neighborhoods and aerial bombardments on the western side of the city, where the U.S. military says many insurgents have been based since the last major offensive in March cleared them from eastern Baqubah.

Until early Tuesday, when some 10,000 troops launched the new mission, U.S. forces rarely had crossed the Tigris river into the western side of town. The latest operation is targeting insurgents who have tried to establish Baqubah as their own capital with strictly Islamic rules imposed on residents. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on June 20, 2007 at 08:29 PM in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Monday, 18 June 2007
 

2007.06.18 Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan/Pakistan Roundup

Who Killed the Americans in Karbala?

January's attack on U.S. forces at the Iraqi government complex in Karbala has become a kind of epic unsolved mystery among troops at Forward Operating Base Iskan, where soldiers from the unit involved are based. There is no shortage of theories among the roughly 30 troops who were there as to whom was responsible for the attack. Many soldiers believe the attackers, who appeared wearing U.S. military uniforms and speaking English, were Iranian operatives from the notorious Quds Force. Some think the assault party that entered the complex in a convoy of SUVs was a rogue cell of the Mahdi Army. Still others suspect the hit team was a kind of all-star insurgent squad, with skilled fighters from the Mahdi Army, Iran and the Badr Brigade, another Shi'ite militia.

While much has been said about the attackers who stormed the compound from the outside, little has been revealed about the possible involvement of Iraqi Police who were inside at the time. But the final report of the official military investigation into the incident says there is some evidence to suggest that Iraqi Police who'd been working with U.S. forces in Karbala for over a year helped orchestrate the attack.

Below the fold:

  • Latest Haditha Prosecution Implosion

See also:


Latest Haditha Prosecution Implosion
Bruce Kesler

OK, it may be the prosecution’s job to put the best light on their charges, or worst on the defendant, but the prosecution of the Haditha Marines is again being exposed as lacking merit.

Yesterday, the San Diego Union-Tribune reports:

The Marine officer who will help decide whether Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt should face trial expressed doubt yesterday about the prosecution's assertions that Sharratt killed defenseless Iraqis execution-style. ...

Another local reporter at the hearing wrote:

Lt. Col. Paul Ware, who will recommend whether to send Sharratt to trial, challenged the prosecution, saying the government's theory of the case do not warrant the three counts of unpremeditated murder filed against Sharratt in December. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on June 18, 2007 at 12:06 AM in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Tuesday, 12 June 2007
 

"The One"

xxxx

xxx

I'm not going to have a lot to say about this one till the review copy I've been promised arrives but do check out Blackfive's post here and follow the links. I already know enough just from that post to know this won't be a book I have to make myself make time to read simply because I promised to review it. I can hardly wait till it gets here and it will affect my blogging when it does.

***

Read the first chapter of the book online here. (H/T: Michelle Malkin)

Contributed by Bill Faith on June 12, 2007 at 12:08 AM in Afghanistan, Books, The American Warrior, US Navy | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack


Wednesday, 30 May 2007
 

2007.05.30 Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan/"The media sucks." Roundup

See previous: 2007.05.29 Iraq/Iran Roundup

Below the fold (newest items at the top):

  • Five U.S. Soldiers Killed When Taliban Apparently Downs NATO Helicopter in Afghanistan 
  • Iraqi, U.S. Forces Raid Sadr City in Search for 5 Kidnapped British Citizens
  • Al-Sadr militia suspected of kidnapping Britons
  • 'We Are the Only People Preventing Them From Telling the Story'
  • 5 Brits kidnapped in Baghdad
    • Five Britons seized by Iraqi insurgents 
    • Westerners kidnapped in Baghdad — with 40 Iraqi police cars on the scene
    • Private guards seized in swift operation by unknown gang
    • Stop here and load weapon: another day’s work for the bodyguards

Just read 'em:


*** *** *** Fold (but please don't spindle or mutilate) *** *** ***


Five U.S. Soldiers Killed When Taliban Apparently
Downs NATO Helicopter in Afghanistan
 

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan —  Five U.S. soldiers were among seven people killed when a Chinook helicopter was apparently shot down Wednesday evening in Afghanistan's most volatile province, a U.S. military official said. The Taliban claimed responsibility.

Initial reports suggested the helicopter was hit with a rocket-propelled grenade, the U.S. military official said on condition of anonymity because the crash was being investigated.

NATO's International Security Assistance Force said seven ISAF soldiers were killed after the CH-47 Chinook went down in Helmand province near Kajaki, the site of a major hydroelectric damn and scene of fierce battles in recent months.

The crew of five and two military passengers died, NATO said. It did not release nationalities, but a U.S. official said the two passengers were not American. There were no survivors. ...


Iraqi, U.S. Forces Raid Sadr City in
Search for 5 Kidnapped British Citizens

BAGHDAD  —  Hundreds of Iraqi and U.S. troops cordoned off sections of Baghdad's Sadr City slum early Wednesday and conducted a series of raids in an apparent effort to find five British citizens whom Iraqi officials believed were abducted by the Shiite Mahdi Army militia.

British Embassy officials held ongoing talks Wednesday with Iraqi officials to discuss the situation, Britain's Foreign Office said. Britain's COBRA crisis committee was also to meet for the second day.

The five men were pulled out of a Finance Ministry office by about 40 heavily armed men in police uniforms in broad daylight Tuesday and driven in a convoy of 19 four-wheel-drive vehicles toward Sadr City, according to Iraqi officials in the Interior and Finance ministries.

A top Interior Ministry official, who refused to be named because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said the authorities were working on the assumption the five men were abducted by radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army, because the area they were taken from is controlled by the militia. ...


Al-Sadr militia suspected of kidnapping Britons

Iraq's most prominent Shia militia has emerged as the chief suspect in the kidnappings of five British nationals in Iraq.

Negotiations with the Mahdi Army are already under way after one of several spokesmen for the armed force under the command of the Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr claimed responsibility for the kidnappings at the finance ministry in Baghdad.

Hundreds of Iraqi and American troops raided Sadr City, Baghdad’s largest Shia neighbourhood, in an operation that ended early today. Residents said areas of Sadr City were sealed off and several arrests were made.

Iraqi forces have established a special battalion of soldiers and police officers to search for the kidnapped men. “We are conducting search operations near the site where the abduction took place,” said Brig Gen Qassim al Musawi, an Iraqi army spokesman. ...


'We Are the Only People Preventing Them From Telling the Story'
James Taranto

In a Memorial Day column, David Carr of the New York Times complains about a U.S. military rule requiring that embedded reporters "obtain a signed consent from a wounded soldier before the image can be published. Images that put a face on the dead, that make them identifiable, are simply prohibited."

Why is it so important to show images of hurt and dead Americans? A fellow Timesman gives away the game:

James Glanz, a Baghdad correspondent who will become bureau chief for The New York Times next month, said that although he and others had many great experiences working with the rank-and-file soldiers, some military leaders seem determined to protect something besides the privacy of their troops.

"As the number of reporters there dwindles further and further because of the difficult conditions we work under, the kind of work they are able to publish becomes very important," Mr. Glanz said. "This tiny remaining corps of reporters becomes a greater and greater problem for the military brass because we are the only people preventing them from telling the story the way they want it told."

Hmm, we thought the job of a reporter was to tell stories, not to prevent others from doing so. Furthermore, is it even possible to imagine a Times correspondent saying his job is to prevent the enemy from telling its story?

And here's an example of the kind of journalism the Times's Baghdad bureau produces. This is from a news account, also in yesterday's Times: ...


Five Britons seized by Iraqi insurgents 
Deborah Haynes and Stephen Farrell in Baghdad 

Whitehall was facing the prospect of a lengthy hostage stand-off last night after five Britons were kidnapped in central Baghdad in one of the most brazen abductions of Westerners since the fall of Saddam Hussein.

Those seized, a computer consultant and his four security guards, were taken in daylight by dozens of armed insurgents dressed in the fatigues of Iraqi police commandos.

The Cobra emergency committee, with representatives from MI6, the SAS and the Metropolitan Police, met at the Cabinet Office yesterday to consider options for gaining the release of the five men.

Tony Blair, on a trip to Libya, said: “We will do everything we possibly can to help.” ...

See related:


Contributed by Bill Faith on May 30, 2007 at 12:20 AM in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Thursday, 24 May 2007
 

2007.05.24 Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan/"The media sucks" Roundup

See previous: 2007.05.23 Iraq/Iran Roundup

Below the fold (newest items at the top):

  • Nutroots aghast at possibility that conditions might be improving in Anbar
  • Senate Approves Iraq War Funding Bill Without Timetable ...
  • Lefty embed to Dems: Troops want to fight on
  • House Approves War Funding Bill Without Troop Withdrawal Timelines 
  • WaPo weasel disses milbloggers
  • Bush Pledges to Work With Allies to Strengthen Sanctions Against Iran
  • Bush warns of heavy fighting in Iraq this summer
  • Bush's Wars are Safer For the Military that Clinton's Peace?
  • Shift news to successes in Iraq, soldier urges 
  • "Strategic" Polling On Afghanistan
  • Al Qaeda Has Mastered Media Manipulation in Iraq

*** *** *** Fold (but please don't spindle or mutilate) *** *** ***


Nutroots aghast at possibility that conditions might be improving in Anbar
Allahpundit

InstaGlenn’s post doesn’t quite capture all of the nuance of this little blog tiff they’re having with Joe Klein, which is actually just the latest skirmish in their ongoing war on big-media lefties like him and David Broder who dare to criticize liberals occasionally. (Google “Joe Klein” and “bloggers” and you’ll see what I mean.) Nor does he note the contempt towards Gen. Petraeus that drips from Rick Ellison McEllensburg’s screed, although he does drily mention in passing Ellison’s sneering reference to “shiny uniforms.”

But it’s worth clicking for the snark: ...

Read the whole thing, and do follow the link to Instapundit's post.


Senate Approves Iraq War Funding Bill
Without Timetable for Withdrawing U.S. Troops
 

WASHINGTON —  Bowing to President Bush, the Democratic-controlled Congress grudgingly approved fresh billions for the Iraq war Thursday night, minus the troop withdrawal timeline that drew his earlier veto.

"The Iraqi government needs to show real progress in return for America's continued support and sacrifice," said the commander in chief, and he warned that August could prove to be a bloody month for U.S. troops in Baghdad's murderous neighborhoods.

The Senate vote to send the legislation to the president was 80-14. Less than two hours earlier, the House had cleared the measure, 280-142, with Republicans supplying the bulk of the support.

Five months in power on Capitol Hill, Democrats in both houses coupled their concession to the president with pledges to challenge his policies anew. "This debate will go on," vowed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and if anything, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada was more emphatic.

"Senate Democrats will not stop our efforts to change the course of this war until either enough Republicans join with us to reject President Bush's failed policy or we get a new president," he said.

Did someone say "new president?" I can dig it. Fred!!!!!!

Michelle Malkin notes: Oh, the nutroots are as unhappy with the White Flag Dems right now as grass-roots conservatives are with the Amnesty Republicans: ...


Lefty embed to Dems: Troops want to fight on
Allahpundit

It’s Spencer Ackerman, formerly a war supporter and contributor to TNR, now a war opponent and embed in Iraq for The American Prospect. Sectarian killings are on the rise again, the public has further soured on the mission, and according to Ackerman, “nothing in Iraq worth fighting for remains achievable, and nothing achievable in Iraq remains worth fighting for.” (Not even preventing ethnic cleansing?) So he agrees with the Dems that it’s time to stop the war. He just wants them to stop pretending that they’re doing what they’re doing to help the troops, because as it turns out, most of the troops don’t want that kind of “help.”

Haunted by Vietnam, Democrats are determined to express support for the troops. This is admirable. The truth of the matter, however, is this: many troops in Iraq, perhaps even most of them, want to stay and fight. That doesn’t mean that we should stay in Iraq any longer. It does mean, however, that if Democrats want to bridge the divide between themselves and the military—an effort further complicated by their opposition to the war—they’re going to have to recognize that arguing in the name of the troops isn’t going to work…

There’s more at the link, including an argument about why the troops’ assessment should be given due regard but only as one piece of the puzzle and only then after we’ve discounted for the “never say die” can-do attitude that would skew the view of any honorable professional soldier. The shining irony, of course, is that until now the left has invested veterans with absolute moral authority when it comes to opining on the war (but only if they’re against it): that’s the root of the chickenhawk slur, that’s what forces the media to take vets-by-proxy like Cindy Sheehan seriously, that’s why Murtha emerged as a leading anti-war spokesman — he served in the Corps, and was thus possessed of a battle-hardened second sight to which the Chimperor wasn’t privy — and that’s why the Kossacks were so bubbly about the crop of Iraq war vets who ran for Congress last year as Democrats. I take Ackerman’s piece to be a tacit warning to all of them that the chickens have come home to roost and it might be time once again to see the virtues in civilian supervision of the military. ...


House Approves War Funding Bill Without Troop Withdrawal Timelines

WASHINGTON —  Bowing to President Bush, the Democratic-controlled House reluctantly approved fresh billions for the Iraq war on Thursday, minus the troop withdrawal timeline that drew his earlier veto.

The 280-142 vote sent the bill to the Senate for final passage, expected later Thursday night.

"The Iraqi government needs to show real progress in return for America's continued support and sacrifice," said Bush, and he warned that August could prove to be a bloody month for U.S. troops in Baghdad's murderous neighborhoods.

Five months in power on Capitol Hill, Democrats coupled their concession to the president with pledges to challenge his policies anew. "This debate will go on," vowed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, announcing plans to hold votes by fall on four separate measures seeking a change in course.

From the White House to the Capitol, the day's events closed out one chapter in an epic, wartime struggle pitting Congress against commander in chief over the future of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,400 U.S. troops.

House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio choked back tears as he stirred memories of the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "After 3,000 of our fellow citizens died at the hands of these terrorists, when are we going to take them on? When are we going to defeat them," he asked.  ...


WaPo weasel disses milbloggers 
Michelle Malkin

You remember WaPo blogger William "obscene amenities" Arkin. Well, he's at it again--this time taking a swipe at milbloggers:

...The MilBloggers got an extra boost of attention after the news about the Army's "crackdown" on blogs, with the overheated claim that the new operations security (OPSEC) and bandwidth rules cut off soldiers from their families and restricting people's freedoms. An extra boost from whom, you ask? From the mainstream media they so seemingly despise...

Blackfive responds: ...


Bush Pledges to Work With Allies
to Strengthen Sanctions Against Iran

WASHINGTON —  President Bush called Iran's ongoing nuclear enrichment program unacceptable Thursday, pledging to work with U.S. allies to toughen sanctions against the renegade regime. ...

The president warned nuclear capabilities for Iran threatens the world a day after the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog agency released a report that said Iran has expanded its uranium enrichment program despite U.N. demands to stop.

"In Iran, with a nuclear weapon, would be incredibly destabilizing for the world," Bush said. "It's in their interests that we work collaboratively to continue to isolate that regime."

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will work with European partners, Bush said.

"The world has spoken and has said no nuclear weapons programs. Yet they're constantly ignoring the demands," Bush said.


Bush warns of heavy fighting in Iraq this summer

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- As Congress was poised to approve money for U.S. forces in Iraq on Thursday, President Bush warned Americans to expect "heavy fighting" this summer during a critical time in his war strategy.

Answering reporters' questions at a White House news conference, Bush said the developments would occur once U.S. military reinforcements are in place in mid-June.

"We can expect more American and Iraqi casualties," Bush said. "We must provide our troops with the funds and resources they need to prevail." ...

Congress was set to vote Thursday on a war spending bill without troop timetables that have delayed passage of the $120 billion measure for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The House is to vote this evening, with a Senate vote expected soon after. ...


Bush's Wars are Safer For the Military that Clinton's Peace?
Confederate Yankee

It sure sounds odd but that is what the numbers seem to show in regard to military fatalities during the current and most recent administrations.

I'd be interested in countering arguments, should anyone feel like making them, though the figures provided may make a certain amount of sense in one context.

Anecdotally speaking, I recall that the various sports teams at my high school seemed to take more injuries in scrimmages than in games. Coaches often attributed such injuries to a lack of focus and less than full intensity on the part of the injured when other athletes were scrimmaging at "game speed." ...

I hate to drop an "amnesty bill" in the punch bowl here -- The Lord knows I'm no Clinton fan -- but we didn't just stop suffering non-combat fatalities when we invaded Afghanistan. As much as I hate to call attention to it I think the linked Gateway Pundit post is comparing apples to oranges. Go read it and see what you think.


Shift news to successes in Iraq, soldier urges
John Carlson (H/T: Lorie Byrd)

A tired and disgusted Iowa soldier fired off an e-mail a few days ago, telling family and friends how things are going in Iraq.

A Blackhawk helicopter pilot, Chief Warrant Officer Jim Funk has flown more than 80 combat missions since he arrived there in October.

He described his Boone-based unit's successes after 5,000 hours of flying out of LSA Anaconda, a huge American base north of Baghdad. He talked about the tragedies he and his fellow Iowans have witnessed and his worries of becoming complacent as he goes on mission after mission.

Morale?

"We're treading water," the Ames man told the people closest to him. "We continue to kick butt on missions and take care of each other, even though we know the American public and government DOES NOT stand behind us.

Ohhhh, they all say they support us, but how can you support me (the soldier) if you don't support my mission or my objectives. We watch the news over here. Every time we turn it on we see the American public and Hollywood conducting protests and rallies against our 'illegal occupation' of Iraq."

His greatest frustration? The performance of the people who deliver the news to the American people.

I'll let him say it, in his own words, in the letter, which found its way to me: ... 


"Strategic" Polling On Afghanistan

Just go read it. (H/T:Don Surber)


Al Qaeda mastered media manipulation in Iraq
Lorie Byrd (H/T: LB)

WASHINGTON - An aspect of the war on terrorism that gets too little attention, yet is as important as any other, is the media war. Whether they realize it, members of the mainstream media are participants in the war on terrorism, and nowhere is that more evident than in Iraq.

Blogger Bill Roggio, who has embedded as a journalist in Iraq and Afghanistan, says the enemy’s documents reveal that much of their strategy revolves around manipulation of the media. An enemy unable to beat us on the battlefield is employing a strategy of attacks planned specifically for maximum media coverage and effect.

Roggio recently told the Christian Science Monitor that most mainstream media reporters “display a lack of knowledge of counterinsurgency and the role the media plays in an insurgency’s information campaign.” He says al Qaeda and insurgent groups frequently choose their targets to get specific media coverage they desire.

He cited the way a suicide attack in the Anbar province was reported as an example. “U.S. success in Anbar was immediately negated when al Qaeda conducted a suicide attack in Ramadi in early May, and The Associated Press ‘reported’ that the attack dealt ‘a blow to recent U.S. success in reclaiming the Sunni city from insurgents.’ Al Qaeda conducted the attack to generate such an opening paragraph.” ...

Journalist Michael Yon describes a similar attempt to manipulate the media.  ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on May 24, 2007 at 02:14 PM in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est, Media Malpractice | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Thursday, 19 April 2007
 

2007.04.19 Dem Perfidy // Islamism Delenda Est Roundup

Updated from the top. Please treat this as a blog-within-a-blog, come back often, and scroll down till you hit something you saw on your last visit.

  • Into Every Life, Some Reid Must Fall
  • Your chance to tell a treasonous rat bastard what you think of him
  • Harry Reid Declares Iraq War is Lost
  • Jon Voight said what?
  • Beyond the Surge, The Strategy
  • Democrats Would Make Iraq Timetable in Bill 'Advisory'

Click here to see my last previous roundup.

***

Into Every Life, Some Reid Must Fall 
Dafydd ab Hugh

Today's lily-livered belly crawling by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Caesar's Palace, 95%), flatly announcing that "this war is lost," should disqualify him from the "leadership" position he now occupies, say I... since he is no longer leading but deserting.

Reid triumphally pronounced defeat in a press conference he called shortly after leaving the White House and his discussion with President Bush. Reid particularly singled out the counterinsurgency strategy -- which of course he belittled as "the surge" -- as having been an abject failure... because there were some big bombings yesterday:

"Now I believe myself ... that this war is lost, and that the surge is not accomplishing anything, as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday," said Reid, of Nevada....

Well, who could argue with that? I also conclude that, since it was chilly yesterday, therefore global warming is false.

People of at least ordinary intelligence understand that both global warming theory and the counterinsurgency strategy must be evaluated after a reasonably long period of time: ten years or so for the former, six or seven months for the latter. In both cases, a single day is void of meaning.

I have had my suspicions about Reid from the git go. Consider the biography of Harry "Pinky" Reid. ...

***

Your chance to tell a treasonous rat bastard what you think of him

An invitation for our troops 
Michelle Malkin

Active-duty military readers and military bloggers: If you'd like to send a message to the treacherous Harry Reid--who just declared the war in Iraq lost today--e-mail me or leave a trackback. I'll reprint/link them here as they come in. Here is Reid's contact form. He really needs to hear from you.  ...

Rejoinder: Appeal For Courage.

Related must-read: ...

I've been home from Nam almost 35 years, so I guess my comments aren't really what Michelle's looking for. Still, 35 years isn't nearly long enough to forget what it feels like to watch your country snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in a war you helped win, a war thousands of your brothers didn't come home from. Let's spit on the graves of a few thousand more dead soldiers, Harry. Hell, why not? They probably didn't vote for you anyway. You sorry son of a syphilitic crack whore, I may not live to piss on your grave but a lot of younger dogs will; the line will stretch for miles. 

***

Harry Reid Declares Iraq War is Lost 
Kim Priestap

I'd make a bigger deal out of this if it weren't so predictable:

The war in Iraq "is lost" and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Congress, Harry Reid, said Thursday. ...

Before Harry Reid proclaims the surge is a failure, maybe he should wait until it's in full swing for a while.

Dan Riehl: Harry Reid Is No Walter Cronkite

***

Jon Voight said what?
Michelle Malkin

Radar Magazine sent me a link to a very interesting interview with Jon Voight, the Hollywood actor and father of Angelina Jolie. Here's an excerpt:

You recently visited with wounded troops at Walter Reed. What were your impressions?

I was deeply impressed by them. Most I spoke to were young people, around 20 years old. And they were really very eloquent, very positive, very respectful. You have to be proud of the children we're turning out from looking at this group of people. For me, I would much rather hear from these guys than the people who are presenting the news on television on a daily basis.

Were you able to gauge the mood among the troops—have they lost a sense of mission?

These guys say, well, it's possible to win it. And I'll tell you one thing they said that was very remarkable: the increase in troops that has been recommended by the president, they say anybody who's over there knows the value of backup and we should be behind this. When you're out in that situation in danger, you want to know you've got backup. Only one guy said he wasn't going back to Iraq, and he had been wounded a couple times. But all the other guys wanted to go back. One young woman, a very attractive young woman, had her leg amputated. But she says she's going to find a way to get back into it. She just reupped and she said they would find something for her to do.

Do you think it's possible to win the Iraq War?

Here's what I think: ...

He also talks about left-wing bias in the media, his support for the Patriot Act, and his criticism of Bush hatred. ...

***

Beyond the Surge, The Strategy
Greyhawk

(A companion piece to this entry can be read here: Slaughter)

More University Killings?

BAGHDAD - A suicide car bomber killed 12 people outside a Baghdad take-away shop on Thursday, one day after 190 people died in a bombing blitz that brought into question the US-backed security plan for the capital.

The latest bomber blew up his car in the central Jadriyah district -- a majority Shiite area -- killing 12 and wounding 28 and also setting ablaze a nearby truck loaded with gas cylinders, a security official said.

The force of the blast ripped through civilians outside the popular Hassan take-away eatery, where university students had stopped to buy lunch, said a police colonel scrambled to the scene.

One thing generally absent within stories that bring "into question the US-backed security plan for the capital" are any attempts to answer said questions. But explanations of exactly what Coalition Forces are doing are available and unclassified - in the broader details - thus there's no valid reason to leave the reader to conclude that the answer is "nothing".

But for reasons as inexplicable as the motives behind suicide attacks on university students, most reporters are content to do just that.

Kudos to the New York Times (yes, the New York Times) for not leaving that gap in their report on this week's atrocities: ...

***

Democrats Would Make Iraq Timetable in Bill 'Advisory' 
By Peter Baker and Jonathan Weisman (H/T: Michelle Malkin)

Congressional Democratic leaders are moving to make their proposed timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq "advisory" as they seek to reconcile two versions of war spending legislation into a single bill that they plan to pass next week, according to several House members.

The compromise language would keep the deadlines included in the original House bill but make them nonbinding, as the Senate version did, and would allow President Bush to waive troop-readiness standards, lawmakers said. Bush has vowed to veto legislation with timetables in it, calling it a schedule of surrender, but Democrats hope to show that they are being flexible and the president rigid by softening the terms. The compromises may cost Democrats votes among antiwar liberals, but they hope to pick up some Republicans.

The haggling between congressional Democrats came as their leaders met at the White House with Bush to try to hash out their dispute. Both sides termed it a polite, productive meeting in which they restated their positions but emerged without an agreement. Democrats promised to send Bush their bill next week. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on April 19, 2007 at 02:30 PM in Afghanistan, Dem Dumbness, Dem Perfidy, Iran, Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Saturday, 14 April 2007
 

2007.04.14 Dem Perfidy // Islamism Delenda Est Roundup

Updated from the top. Please treat this as a blog-within-a-blog, come back often, and scroll down till you hit something you saw on your last visit.

  • Bush: Democrats Offer Enemies a Victory
  • What Happened To 'Follow The Money'?
  • Good News Bad News
  • AP Quantizes Counterinsurgency Success
  • AP tally: Civilian deaths in Baghdad down 45% since February
  • IRAQ: Mentally handicapped children used in attacks
  • Condi to Bush: Release the Irbil Five; Bush to Condi: No
  • Muslim Brotherhood Says They Weren't Invited

***

***

Bush: Democrats Offer Enemies a Victory

WASHINGTON —  President Bush said Saturday that a Democratic plan to set an end date for the war gives "our enemies the victory they desperately want."

Bush and Democratic congressional leaders are trying to bolster their positions on the Iraq war before a scheduled White House meeting.

At Bush's invitation, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are due at the White House on Wednesday to discuss the war, particularly a bill funding the military mission through September.

In both the House and Senate, Democrats have attached timelines for withdrawing troops to the bill containing $96 billion in military funding.

Bush says the meeting will be about his nonnegotiable stance on a timeline.

"Instead of approving this funding, Democrats in Congress have spent the past 68 days pushing legislation that would undercut our troops," he said in his weekly radio address. "They passed bills that would impose restrictions on our military commanders and set an arbitrary date for withdrawal from Iraq, giving our enemies the victory they desperately want." ...

***

What Happened To 'Follow The Money'?
Ed Morrissey

It gets disheartening defending the obvious pre-9/11 connections between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda when the White House seems unmotivated to do so, but Thomas Jocelyn and Andy McCarthy haven't been chased off the story by Senator Carl Levin and the Washington Post. When both asserted that no one had found connections between Saddam and AQ, they both reminded readers to follow the money:

But Levin's story, which was simply repeated without any real investigation by the Post or even the inspector general's office, relies on a false dichotomy. The senator now pretends that the CIA and other intelligence outfits had reached a rock-solid conclusion that there was no noteworthy relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda in 2002, but Feith's shop improperly pressed on. The Post summarized the inspector general's report as saying: " the CIA had concluded in June 2002 that there were few substantiated contacts between al-Qaeda operatives and Iraqi officials and had said that it lacked evidence of a long-term relationship like the ones Iraq had forged with other terrorist groups."

This is simply revisionist history at its worst. ...

***

Poor innocent mistweated widdle flying imams -- Update 19

See previous: Poor innocent mistweated widdle flying imams -- Update 18

Traveling Imams Want Kramer And Costanza
Ed Morrissey

James Zumwalt, a former Marine and an anti-terrorism activist, calls for legislation protecting ordinary Americans who report suspicious behavior, regardless of whether their information uncovers a terrorist plot or not. His New York Times opinion piece references the TV show Seinfeld as an example:

[...]

The analogy isn't perfect, as Zumwalt notes. One cannot impose a requirement to act on free citizens when they see someone in danger -- but we can make it safe for people to do so. Allowing suits against people who provide information to authorities about potential crimes and terrorist attacks only degrades our ability to prevent or limit either.

Zumwalt mentions an aspect of this that I believe most people miss. ...

***

Jules Crittenden's latest Good News Bad News is up. Worth your time as always.

***

AP Quantizes Counterinsurgency Success
Hatched by Dafydd

Grudgingly -- peevishly -- truculently, the Associated Press has started to report figures that show us just how successful Lt.Gen. David Petraeus' counterinsurgency has been so far:

Figures compiled by the AP from Iraqi police reports show that 1,586 civilians were killed in Baghdad between the start of the offensive and Thursday.

That represents a sharp drop from the 2,871 civilians who died violently in the capital during the two months that preceded the security crackdown.

Outside the capital, 1,504 civilians were killed between Feb. 14 and Thursday, April 12 compared with 1,009 deaths during the two previous months, the AP figures show.

Let's put this into perspective. In Baghdad, civilian deaths dropped 45% in the last two months; throughout all Iraq, 20% fewer civilians were slain. The rise in killings was in parts of Iraq still in the red zone -- or red zone transitioning to pink -- while the drop in killings was in areas transitioning from pink to white.

Just to remind folks of what these terms mean, I refer you to ...

***

AP tally: Civilian deaths in Baghdad down 45% since February 
Allahpundit

According to Iraqi police reports obtained by the AP. Great news, but there are caveats. Civilian deaths outside Baghdad over the same two-month period are up 49% and U.S. KIAs inside the capital are up 21%. It’s also unclear how reliable the police reports are. WaPo ran a white-knuckle page-one story a few days ago about U.S. troops inside Sadr City who suspect virtually every last cop on the beat of either being JAM or afraid to cross the JAM. If that’s true, you can bet there are plenty of killings going on that aren’t making it into the blotter.

Reasons?

It is unclear why deaths outside Baghdad have increased. However, U.S. military officials say both Sunni and Shiite extremists left Baghdad ahead of the crackdown, instead stepping up their operations in a belt of communities around the capital.

The rise in deaths outside Baghdad may also be partly a result of clashes in Anbar province between al-Qaida extremists and Sunni tribes that have broken with the extremist movement.

That trend will continue and probably even increase once operations against AQ in Diyala province get going. ...

***

IRAQ: Mentally handicapped children used in attacks 

BAGHDAD, 10 April 2007 (IRIN) - The dreams 13-year-old Barak Muhammad (not his real name) had of leading a normal teenage life were dashed when his father sold him to al-Qaeda militants. Being mentally handicapped, he said he was considered a burden by his family and was told he would be better off sacrificing his life for his country.

“I don’t have a mother and never went to school. I was dreaming of a day that I would go to school like my other brothers, but I was considered different. My father was always telling me that I was a mistake in his life, a boy that was just bringing expenses and problems,” Barak said.

Barak's father sold him to al-Qaeda in Iraq for US $10,000 to support his remaining five children. Now, Barak is in training to fight US and Iraqi troops.

“Today, I help some men who say they are from al-Qaeda group. They fight people who are occupying Iraq and they said that if I do my work well, God will protect me and make me be a healthy boy,” Barak said, adding that fighters promised him that he would soon join his mother in heaven.  ... 

***

Condi to Bush: Release the Irbil Five
Allahpundit

Bush to Condi: no.

Dedicated to my pal Tanya, who, like me, once thought Condi was presidential timber. Those were the days.

At a meeting of the president’s top foreign policy team Tuesday, the administration decided that the five Iranians will remain in custody and go through the periodic three-month review used for other foreign detainees picked up in Iraq, U.S. officials said. The next review may not happen for weeks, and possibly not until July…

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice went into the Tuesday meeting with a recommendation to free the men, but after a full review of the options she went along with the consensus, U.S. officials said. Vice President Cheney’s office made the firmest case for continuing to hold the men.

Supposedly one of the factors here is that they don’t want to release the five too soon after the British sailors got sprung or else it’ll look too much like what it actually is, i.e., a quid pro quo. So it’s not so much that it’s not happening as that it’s not happening now. Looks like I was too pessimistic in predicting April 26 as the release date, which makes this the second time today I’ve been wrong about something and the second time I’ve been happy about it.

Another factor is the risk of Iran starting to kidnap our guys to force an exchange. Has that process already begun? Maybe: ...

***

Muslim Brotherhood Says They Weren't Invited

The Muslim Brotherhood is denying yesterday’s report that they were invited to speak to US Congress: Islamist Group Denies Report of Hoyer Invitation to Visit Congress.

(CNSNews.com) - The Muslim Brotherhood has denied an Egyptian newspaper report saying that a visiting delegation led by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer had invited members of the radical Islamist group to visit the U.S. Congress.

“These reports are totally groundless,” Muslim Brotherhood executive bureau member Mohamed Mursi said in a statement posted on the organization’s website.

Mursi said the group’s stance on dialogue with any foreign official was that “this dialogue should be held through sound diplomatic methods in the presence of a representative from the Egyptian Foreign Ministry.” ...

Allahpundit has more here.

***

Did you come by yesterday?

  • 2007.04.13 Dem Perfidy // Islamism Delenda Est Roundup
    • More straight talk from the troops
    • The Real Story about the Iraqi Parliament Bombing
    • The Washington Post spins intel
    • Malpractice or Malice?
    • AQCLU
    • Rumors on Green Zone and Bridge Bombings
    • In an Instant, a Junkyard of Humanity
    • WaPo reporter describes Iraqi parliament bombing — from inside the cafeteria
    • Death Toll Reduced In Iraq Parliament Bomb
    • Witness to a Baghdad bombing
    • It's Time To Play Family Feud! (In Waziristan)
    • Crack up: Islamic Army in Iraq splits from Al Qaeda
    • America, Iraq, and the question of total war
    • Modern Foreign Policy Execution
    • Biden Time

Contributed by Bill Faith on April 14, 2007 at 01:35 AM in Afghanistan, Dem Dumbness, Dem Perfidy, Iran, Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Wednesday, 11 April 2007
 

2007.04.11 Islamism Delenda Est // Dem Perfidy Roundup

  • War Czar
  • The Taliban Offensive: Red On Red
  • Iraq in the Balance
  • A Citizen Journalist In Fallujah
  • McCain: I Blame Rumsfeld For Iraq
  • Where Do Nancy Pelosi's Loyalties Lie?
  • Pelosi Diplomacy: Legitimizing Terrorism
  • Gates: Army tours extended by three months
  • Video: Angry Gates unloads on Pentagon leaker
  • I'm sorry for selling my story, says Iran hostage Mr Bean
  • British servicemen unload on littlest sailor, a.k.a. “Mr. Bean";
    Update: Video of Mr. Bean impersonation added!
  • Iraqi insurgents being trained in Iran, U.S. says
  • al Qaeda attack in Algiers

Some things you might have missed yesterday:

***

War Czar
Jules Crittenden

Finding the right general isn’t easy.  Just ask Lincoln.  I’d suggest retired Marine Gen. John J. “Jack” Sheehan, a former top NATO commander, is not the guy, seeing he can’t keep his mouth shut about a White House initiative that hasn’t been announced yet, and also doesn’t get it:

“The very fundamental issue is, they don’t know where the hell they’re going.”

Where they are going is “to win.”  Who wants a general who not only blabs, but doesn’t want to do that? ...

***

The Taliban Offensive: Red On Red 
Ed Morrissey

The Taliban had promised that their 2007 spring offensive would have the West's forces reeling backwards and out of Afghanistan. Someone's reeling, but it isn't NATO or Pakistan. The Taliban has a different fight on its hands -- more like a civil war:

When spring came and the snows began to melt in the mountains of Waziristan, Pakistani troops braced themselves for the seasonal upsurge in fighting along the porous border with Afghanistan.

But, when it came, Pakistani soldiers were surprised, and relieved, to see the Taleban loyalists and the militants linked to al-Qaeda who seek sanctuary in this lawless region firing rockets and mortars not at them but at each other.

For the first time since 2001, the Waziri tribesmen who probably harboured Osama bin Laden and remain loyal to the Taleban are fighting against the foreign militants in their midst. ...

The spring thaw has apparently created a meltdown among the jihadis. The Waziri elders have issued a fatwa against the Uzbeks who have come to the Pashtun region. They have gone so far as to call out the lashkar, a religious militia; any man able to bear arms must join or have his home destroyed. They will have their hands full, as the Uzbeks have a reputation for ferocity that outstrips that of the Waziri Pashtuns. ...

***

Iraq in the Balance 
In Washington, panic. In Baghdad, cautious optimism.
By Fouad Ajami

BAGHDAD--For 35 years the sun did not shine here," said a man on the grounds of the great Shia shrine of al-Kadhimiyyah, on the outskirts of Baghdad. I had come to the shrine at night, in the company of the Shia politician Ahmed Chalabi.

We had driven in an armed convoy, and our presence had drawn a crowd. The place was bathed with light, framed by multiple minarets--a huge rectangular structure, its beauty and dereliction side by side. The tile work was exquisite, there were deep Persian carpets everywhere, the gifts of benefactors, rulers and merchants, drawn from the world of Shi'ism.

It was a cool spring night, and beguilingly tranquil. (There were the echoes of a firefight across the river, from the Sunni neighborhood of al-Adhamiyyah, but it was background noise and oddly easy to ignore.) A keeper of the shrine had been showing us the place, and he was proud of its doors made of teak from Burma--a kind of wood, he said, that resisted rain, wind and sun. It was to that description that the quiet man on the edge of this gathering had offered the thought that the sun had not risen during the long night of Baathist despotism. ...

***

***

McCain: I Blame Rumsfeld For Iraq
Ed Morrissey

I took part in a blogger conference on my lunchbreak today with Senator John McCain on the topic of Iraq. McCain, who gave a speech on Iraq at the Virginia Military Institute earlier today, wanted to reach out to New Media sources for his perspective on the progress of the war, the critical nature of our effort there, and the need to persevere until we succeed.

McCain did not pull many punches in this call. Speaking as bluntly as I have heard in some time, he acknowledged the credibility deficit of the Pentagon and White House on the war. Saying that “too often, we misled the American people in the past” about deadenders, mission accomplished, and so on, McCain said that the press has become too reluctant to report actual progress in Iraq. He feels that bloggers and radio hosts can help get real information to the American people and help encourage the nation to remain tenacious.

Who does he blame for the credibility gap? McCain pointed out that President Bush has to accept the ultimate responsibility for that as well as for the faulty strategy used up to this year in attempting to pacify the insurgencies. The Senator says that he is pleased with the direction the White House has taken this year and the energy with which they have pursued it. He faulted the White House for not having regular press conferences dedicated to discussing the progress in Iraq in clear and objective terms, which McCain feels would have disarmed much of the criticism, especially this year.

Ultimately, though, he blames Donald Rumsfeld for shrinking the military and using too light of a footprint in post-invasion Iraq -- a position McCain has consistently maintained for over three years. He also blames Generals Casey and Sanchez for their roles in supporting Rumsfeld's strategies. He believes that General Petraeus, a "charismatic" commander, has the right approach and the skills to succeed in Iraq. McCain also praised Rumsfeld's replacement, Robert Gates, and told us that Pentagon morale has increased substantially since Rumsfeld's departure. ...

***

Where Do Nancy Pelosi's Loyalties Lie? 
Kim Priestap

She just returned from a trip during which she took time to sit down and talk with Bashar Al-Assad, one of the biggest sponsors of terrorism world wide. Now she says she's open to talks with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian megalomaniac leader who just announced that he's now enriching uranium at an industrial level and wants to wipe Israel off the face of the map:

The Democratic speaker from San Francisco and Lantos, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, were asked at a news conference in San Francisco on Tuesday whether on the heels of their recent trip to the Middle East they would be interested in extending their diplomacy in the troubled region with a visit to Iran.

"Speaking just for myself, I would be ready to get on a plane tomorrow morning, because however objectionable, unfair and inaccurate many of (Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's) statements are, it is important that we have a dialogue with him,'' Lantos said. "Speaking for myself, I'm ready to go -- and knowing the speaker, I think that she might be.''

Pelosi did not dispute that statement, and noted that Lantos -- a Hungarian-born survivor of the Holocaust -- brought "great experience, knowledge and judgment" to the recent bipartisan congressional delegation trip to Israel, the Palestinian territories, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia in addition to Syria.

After insisting that she needs to keep an open dialog with leaders of rogue terrorist nations, she refuses to sit down and talk to President Bush about funding for the Global War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan: ...

***

Pelosi Diplomacy: Legitimizing Terrorism 
Confederate Yankee

When Democrat Presidential candidates Clinton, Obama and Edwards dropped out of the Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate that was going to be co-sponsored by Fox News, many liberals crowed over the decision. It is their contention that Fox News is an "illegitimate" news source (or a "propaganda machine," or not even a news outlet at all. Someone should tell Nielsen), and that if these candidates had answered the questions provided by the CBCI in a televised debate on Fox News, it would "legitimize" the network.

Their central argument seems to be that if these Democrat candidates appeared on Fox, that their very presence would legitimize the news network.

Using that same logic, what then, should they make of this?

[...]

Pelosi has already been hammered for undermining U.S. foreign policy and possibly committing a felony when she visited Syrian President Bashir Assad, leader of a Baathist dictatorship that serves as a conduit for weapons bound for terror groups Hezbollah and Hamas, and is a regime that is implicated in the assassination of Lebanon's former prime minister.

Not content with botching her last and possibly illegal attempt to create her own foreign policy separate from that of the official position of the United States, Pelosi seems open to the idea of visiting Iran, a brutal mullacracy that provides munitions and training to terrorist groups, whose officials will be indicted for murder, a regime that has conclusively shipped a significant quantity of weapons into Iraq that have killed American soldiers.

Apparently, the double standard is this: ...

***

Gates: Army tours extended by three months

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Tours of duty for members of the U.S. Army will be extended from 12 months to 15 months effective immediately, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Wednesday.

"What we're trying to do here is provide some long-term predictability to our soldiers and their families," Gates told reporters at the Pentagon.

In exchange for the extension, Gates said the service will be able to give all units a year at home between deployments.

He denied the order was a sign that the Army has passed its breaking point under the stresses of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, saying the service has met or passed its recruiting and retention goals.

But he added that the military has been "stretched" by the conflicts.

And he blasted Tuesday's leak of that proposal to the media, saying the Defense Department hoped to give the troops 48 hours' advance notice of the decision.

The order covers the active-duty Army, which provides most of the estimated 146,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. National Guard and reserve troops would continue to spend a year in the war zone, Gates said. ...

***

Video: Angry Gates unloads on Pentagon leaker 
Allahpundit

He announced today that they’re extending the tours of active-duty soldiers from 12 months to 15, which he claims is a way to make sure everyone has a full year at home when their tours are up. That imagines troops returning to Iraq in 2008 (or 2009), but that shouldn’t come as a surprise: all but the most dovish Democratic withdrawal plans provide for a substantial non-combat force in country to train the Iraqi army that’s going to disintegrate once we pull out.

Like I say, the formal announcement was today, but the informal announcement came two days ago when someone inside the building leaked it to ABC News. No particular reason why, as far as I can tell; they simply wanted to embarrass Bush by sandbagging the troops and their families with the news before they could be personally notified by their commanders. Which brings us to this vintage slow burn. ...

***

I'm sorry for selling my story, says Iran hostage Mr Bean 

Captive sailor Arthur Batchelor, who was dubbed Mr Bean by the Iranians, has apologised for selling his hostage ordeal story and 'letting the Navy down'.

Seaman Batchelor came under fire for cashing in by selling his tale to the tabloid press.

He claimed the cash he was paid would barely pay for his driving test, although colleague Faye Turney is thought to have pocketed up to £100,000.

The 20-year-old's apology came as Defence Secretary Des Browne admitted his decision to allow the former hostages to sell their stories to the media was wrong.

Conservative leader David Cameron demanded an inquiry into the "calamitous" decision.  ...

***

British servicemen unload on littlest sailor, a.k.a. “Mr. Bean”;
Update: Video of Mr. Bean impersonation added!

Allahpundit

Admit it, you’re laughing at the “Mr. Bean” thing.

It’s okay. I am too.

A series of messages on forces’ websites ridiculed Arthur Batchelor and Faye Turney, who cashed in after being held prisoner for 13 days…

Seaman Batchelor’s claim that he cried himself to sleep after his Iranian captors likened him to the comedy character Mr Bean made him a laughing stock.

One serving soldier posted: “Batchelor didn’t do the reputation of servicemen much good either! Being broken by being called Mr Bean FFS! - that must be on a par with Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition and the comfy cushions.”

Comments left on unofficial forces’ websites, the Rum Ration and the British Army Rumour Service laid into Ms Turney and Mr Batchelor.

Another servicemen says of Mr Batchelor’s complaint that his iPod was stolen by the Iranians: “What I wish to know is why a young lad on a boarding party detail needed to take his iPod? If he listened to The Ride of the Valkyries as he sped towards the target ship, what did he listen to on his trip to Iran?”

It goes on and on. Rest assured, if there’s video somewhere in Tehran of them calling him “Mr. Bean,” it’ll surface. And rest equally assured that when it does, it’s going viral. ...

***

Iraqi insurgents being trained in Iran, U.S. says

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraqi insurgents are being trained in Iran to assemble weapons and Iranian-made weapons are still turning up in Iraq, the U.S. military said Wednesday.

The statement comes two months after the United States said it had asked Tehran to stop the flow of weapons into Iraq.

Coalition forces found a cache of Iranian rockets and grenade launchers in Baghdad on Tuesday, spokesman U.S. Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said Wednesday.

"The death and violence in Iraq are bad enough without this outside interference," Caldwell said. "Iran and all of Iraq's neighbors really need to respect Iraq's sovereignty and allow the people of this country the time and the space to choose their own future."

Caldwell showed reporters photographs on Wednesday that he said were found in the weapons cache. In February, Caldwell said the United States had asked Iran to stop the transfer of weapons.

President Bush has said a branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard called the Quds Force is behind the supply of Iranian weapons. Tehran has denied interfering in Iraq.

Caldwell also said Wednesday that two militants who were recently detained said they had received training in Syria, another nation the Bush administration has accused of meddling in the region. ...

***

al Qaeda attack in Algiers
Michelle Malkin

Evan Kohlmann reports:

The Algerian Salafist Group for Prayer and Combat (GSPC)--now known as "Al-Qaida's Committee in the Islamic Maghreb"--has issued a statement today claiming responsibility for dramatic suicide bombings in the capital of Algeria, and allegedly likewise in neighboring Morocco.

23 dead, 2 bombings.

Walid Phares gives the bottom line: "It is about a global Jihadi campaign with Algeria and other countries as "battlefields." ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on April 11, 2007 at 12:04 PM in Afghanistan, Dem Dumbness, Dem Perfidy, Iran, Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est, Nancy Pelosi | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Tuesday, 10 April 2007
 

Australia to double Afghan force

Australia plans to almost double its troop numbers in Afghanistan by next year amid warnings that the Taleban insurgency shows no sign of weakening.

Prime Minister John Howard said without an extra effort, the fight against the militants would not be won. He warned the country to prepare for casualties.  ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on April 10, 2007 at 10:31 PM in Afghanistan, Australia | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Tuesday, 27 March 2007
 

Aussie jihadi pleads guilty

Australian Terror Suspect Pleads
Guilty to Providing Support to Terrorism
 

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba —  Australian terror suspect David Hicks pleaded guilty Monday to a war-crime charge of providing material support to terrorism in a plea bargain that will assure his transfer from Guantanamo's cells to Australia, officials said.

The 31-year-old detainee, who has spent more than five years imprisoned in Guantanamo and was accused of supporting Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, could be sentenced by the end of the week, military officials said. Defense attorneys said a gag order by the military judge prevented them from discussing details of the plea until a sentence is announced.

The United States has agreed to let Hicks serve any sentence in Australia. ...

DELAY ALMOST OVER
Tim Blair

On January 11, CBS News examined - in their own way - the case of Australian Taliban member and Gitmo homeboy David Hicks:

Today marks five years without a day in court for David Hicks ...

And why might that be? ABC national security correspondent Leigh Sales:

The Hicks defence strategy relies on delaying the process for so long that the Australian Government will be forced to ask for the prisoner’s return.

Hmm. Anyway, despite his lawyers’ delaying tactics, Hicks is shortly due to appear in a Gitmo court. Latest word is he’ll make a deal.

UPDATE. Hicks pleads guilty.

UPDATE II. The Australian reports: “Hicks is short and overweight … He did not look unhealthy and certainly not ‘gaunt’ or ‘hollowed cheeked’ as his legal team have described him in recent months.”

UPDATE III.  ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on March 27, 2007 at 02:20 AM in Afghanistan, Australia, Islamism Delenda Est | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Monday, 26 March 2007
 

No Criminal Negligence in Death of Pat Tillman,
But Brass Made Errors in Reporting

SAN JOSE, Calif. —  The military has found no criminal wrongdoing in the friendly fire death of Army Ranger Pat Tillman in Afghanistan, but says there were critical errors in reporting the former NFL star's death and failing to provide details to his family.

Army and Defense Department investigators said Monday that officers looking into the incident passed along misleading and inaccurate information and delayed reporting their belief that Tillman was killed by his fellow soldiers. The investigators recommended the Army take action against the officers. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on March 26, 2007 at 04:28 PM in Afghanistan, The American Warrior, US Army | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Wednesday, 21 March 2007
 

Taliban And Al-Qaeda At War In Wana?
Ed Morrissey:

It's getting to the point where people need a scorecard in Waziristan to keep all of the players straight. A battle broke out today between Taliban elements in Waziristan and Uzbeki terrorists from al-Qaeda who overstayed their welcome in the Pakistani mountains:

Nearly 50 people have been killed after rising tension between local tribesmen and foreign militants in north-west Pakistan erupted into fierce fighting.

Heavy shelling has raged since Monday near Wana in the South Waziristan tribal area close to Afghanistan.

Most of those killed were militants from Uzbekistan suspected of links with al-Qaeda, officials said. ...

Once again, we return to the underlying role of tribalism in the Afghanistan-Pakistan conflict. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on March 21, 2007 at 02:57 PM in Afghanistan, Pakistan | Permalink | Comments (0) |