An Old War Dogs Satellite Site


Tuesday, 08 May 2007
 

2007.05.08 Decision '08 // Dem Stupidity Roundup
(And assorted other "Let's give 'em a country to run" topics)

See previous: 2007.05.07 Decision '08 // Dem Stupidity Roundup ...

Below the fold, newest items at the top:

  • Quayle season?
  • The Flight To Flyover Country
  • All profile, no courage
  • Rudy donated repeatedly to Planned Parenthood in the 1990s
  • Giuliani the Insincere
  • Pro-choice Giuliani called acceptable

Does America Elect Defeatists? 
Hatched by Dafydd ab Hugh

I just received a very pessimistic e-mail from a close friend of mine (not Friend Lee) who is utterly convinced that the Democrats will win the presidency in 2008, even if the Iraq war is going much better. My correspondent is a libertarian-conservative who is obsessed with the "neo-cons," whom he hates with a passion and blames for "hijacking" the Reagan legacy and the Bush presidency (he even wrote a book about it, Post-Nationalism).

But why is he so despondent, utterly convinced that Hillary Clinton will be our next president? First, because he's not naturally an optimistic person; but more important, because my friend truly believes that the American people despise "neo-cons" as much as he does.

This is actually quite a common belief, that the entire country shares one's own burning, heart-felt principles (or obsessions). But I assured him, it's a delusion: The vast majority of Americans have no idea who or what the neo-cons are, and honestly couldn't care less. However, my friend, a political junky (as am I), cannot seem to understand the depths of ennui that most Americans have for the "inside baseball" of politics. As I wrote him: ...

*** ***     *** ***     *** ***     *** ***     *** ***     *** ***

Quayle season?
Don Surber

As Republicans kick the tires on the various candidates offered for 2008, they find themselves wondering if there is one once-married candidate who has never waffled on abortion, has stood tall on tax cuts and who has stood four-square for family values.

There is one name out on there that isn’t being mentioned: Dan Quayle.

I dunno, Don. You say potato, I say potatoe. It might make for an interesting campaign, anyhoo.

***

The Flight To Flyover Country
Ed Morrissey

Political analysts sometimes refer to the space between the two coasts as "flyover country," a space so uninteresting and unimportant that it bears little consideration until someone needs votes. The Midwest, with the exceptions of Chicago and perhaps the Twin Cities, get little credit for sophistication or intellectual interest. For the most part, people make jokes about cows and corn and consider the coastal megalopolises the center of American thought.

Michael Barone, writing in today's OpinionJournal, says that has changed in practice, if not yet in thought. More native-born Americans have left the coastal megalopolises for flyover country, stratifying the big American cities on the coasts and in effect abandoning them to immigrants: ...

***

All profile, no courage
Paul Mirengoff

The Washington Post has a good piece about John Edwards' plans to combat poverty. Edwards has made his program to "end poverty in 30 years" in this country his signature domestic issue. The Post story, by Alec MacGillis, provides insight into both Edwards and the issue.

The centerpiece of the Edwards plan is to do away with public housing projects and replace them with one million rental vouchers through which to disperse the poor into better neighborhoods, closer to good schools and jobs. However, as the Post explains, a major federal experiment started during the Clinton administration shows that dispersing poor families in this fashion does not improve earnings or school performance. When this inconvenient truth was brought to Edwards' attention during his November 2005 symposium on poverty, he apparently had no answer. ...

***

Rudy donated repeatedly to Planned Parenthood in the 1990s
Allahpundit

At least six times, maybe more, according to copies of his tax returns provided to Politico “by aides to a rival campaign, who insisted on not being identified.” The obvious (if unpersuasive) spin would be to insist that the money was meant for lobbying, to defend the right of privacy, not for the actual performance of abortions, which of course Rudy deeply, personally opposes. Instead his camp offered this non-answer:

“Mayor Giuliani has been consistent in his position — he is personally opposed to abortion, but at the same time he understands it is a personal and emotional decision that should ultimately be left up to the woman,” said Maria Comella.

Comella added that, “from the start, Mayor Giuliani has been straight with the American people about where he stands on the issues and saying exactly what he thinks.

“Ultimately, this election is about leadership, and it’s a sign of leadership to stand by your position in the face of political expediency.”

It’s a sign of leadership to insist that you despise abortion after having donated six times to America’s most notorious abortion provider? ...

***

Giuliani the Insincere
On abortion, the former mayor lacks both clarity and conviction.
By Rich Lowry

Rudy Giuliani is supposed to be the candidate of authenticity, the tough-talking former New York City mayor who sticks to his beliefs no matter what. But he is repeating a line that is so flagrantly insincere, it makes any of Hillary Clinton’s canned talking points seem free and natural by comparison.

Giuliani claims he “hates abortion.” Oddly, this hatred didn’t manifest itself until Giuliani realized he had to have something to say to pro-lifers besides that he supported abortion on demand in any circumstance.

Giuliani has been pounded by pundits for his answers on abortion at the first GOP debate. But he didn’t commit a gaffe. He only suffered from the contradictions of a position that appears to be the product of poorly thought-out political calculation. ...

***

Pro-choice Giuliani called acceptable
By Eric Pfeiffer

Two leading Republican lawmakers said yesterday that former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani's pro-choice stance on abortion should not disqualify him from becoming their party's presidential nominee or from receiving the support of conservative voters.

Making the comments were House Majority Leader John A. Boehner of Ohio and Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, one of Mr. Giuliani's rivals for the nomination. Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas, a social conservative also running for the party's nomination, said during the Republican presidential debate last week that he could accept a candidate with differing views on abortion.

"I think it's an uphill fight on that issue," Mr. Boehner said during an appearance on "Fox News Sunday." "But I think a lot of Republican voters see Rudy Giuliani as competent and able to do the job."

Mr. Boehner has not endorsed the Giuliani campaign. He noted the large delegation of House Republicans who met with former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee two weeks ago and said voters are open to a range of primary candidates. 

Contributed by Bill Faith on May 8, 2007 at 12:06 AM in Dem Dumbness, Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Friday, 13 April 2007
 

2007.04.13 Politics/1st Amendment Roundup

Politics/1st Amendment? It gets tough trying to separate the two some days. Updated from the top. Please treat this as a blog-within-a-blog, come back often, and scroll down till you hit something you saw on your last visit.

  • Nancy Pelosi's First 100 Days
  • Barry brings up the rear
  • Hasta la Free Speech
  • ACLU To Defend Nazis Again
  • Democrats in Congress to Consider Making Laws
  • The Law Of Unintended Consequences
  • The Incredible Shrinking Candidates

***

Nancy Pelosi's First 100 Days

***

Barry brings up the rear
Michelle Malkin

Barry-come-lately jumps on the anti-rap misogyny bandwagon. Here's what he said late today:

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday questioned the way some rappers talk about women in songs, saying the lyrics are similar to the derogatory language used by embattled radio host Don Imus.

They are "degrading their sisters. That doesn't inspire me," Obama said of some hip-hop artists when a man in a crowd of about 1,000 questioned him. The Illinois senator was responding to a question of what inspired him, and said God and civil rights activists.

Earlier this week, Obama criticized Imus, who was fired Thursday for labeling the Rutgers women's basketball team "nappy-headed hos." ...

Funny, I don't recall Obama bringing this up when he met Ludacris last fall. The Media Blog reminds us of Luda's ho-ho-ho-ciferousness. ...

***

Hasta la Free Speech 
Jules Crittenden

An apology probably should have sufficed for saying something stupid, unfunny and defamatory.  Not that I want to defend Don Imus. He should have been fired years ago for his colossal body of stupid, unfunny work on an unlistenable show. 

One of my favorite Kurt Vonnegut stories was the one about mandatory handicaps,* and the grotesque ballet of dancers wearing weights so they wouldn’t be more graceful than oanyone else.  That is where we are headed.  Safety helmets, kneepads, blacked-out see-no-evil goggles and gags all around. ...

Big winner in this thing, Katie Couric. Looks like we can only take one media scandal at a time, and her ghost-written plagiarism has dropped off the radar.  According to the standard set in the other, excuse me, latest CBS scandal, they just should have fired Imus’ producer, because he’s the one who set up the stupid remark.

***

ACLU To Defend Nazis Again 
Ed Morrissey

The ACLU lost a number of members in 1977 when they defended the American Nazi Party when they wanted to stage a demonstration in the town of Skokie, Illinois -- a city where a number of Holocaust victims and their families had settled. Over 30,000 ACLU members staged a demonstration of their own when they marched out of the organization, even after the ACLU won the case, and even though the Nazis never did march in Skokie.

Thirty years later, the ACLU proves that they have not learned their lesson. The Ohio chapter has agreed to represent the American Nazi Party again in a conflict over a demonstration permit, this time in a predominantly black neighborhood in Cincinnati. ...

***

Democrats in Congress to Consider Making Laws
Scott Ott

(2007-04-13) — Democrats who control the House and Senate today agreed to a long term “progressive” strategy to begin making laws sometime in late 2008 or early 2009, once they complete their investigations of everyone in the Bush administration. ...

***

The Law Of Unintended Consequences 
Ed Morrissey

Don Imus started a brushfire of criticism for the latest in a series of racially insensitive remarks last week, ultimateky costing him his broadcasting platforms at CBS and NBC. Much of the demand for his termination came from the efforts of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, two former Democratic presidential candidates (2004 and 1988, respectively), who fired up demands for boycotts against Imus' sponsors. Their success may present a problem for their party, however, as Democrats routinely used Imus to access independent white male voters who comprised a large part of his audience:

They came by the hundreds that hot August day in tiny Johnson City, Tenn., gathering on an asphalt parking lot to meet Rep. Harold E. Ford Jr. It was not just that he might become the state's first black senator. More than that, even in Republican eastern Tennessee, the Democratic congressman was a celebrity — a regular guest on Don Imus' radio show.

And today, with Imus' career in tatters, the fate of the controversial shock jock is stirring quiet but heartfelt concern in an unlikely quarter: among Democratic politicians. ...

Who appeared with Imus over the last few years? Men like [Rep. Harold E.] Ford [Jr.], John Kerry, and Barack Obama. Chris Dodd recently appeared to announce his candidacy for the presidential race. Kerry made a few appearances during his presidential bid in 2004, and undoubtedly the Democrats planned to have their eventual nominee do the same next year. Without Imus, the options for talk radio run to whatever's left of Air America -- and Al Franken doesn't work there any more. ...

***

The Incredible Shrinking Candidates
Why is there so little dignity in the presidential campaign?
Peggy Noonan

On Wednesday John McCain distinguished himself with a closely argued and eloquent address in which he spoke seriously and at length of his position on Iraq. He said America faces "an historic choice" with "ramifications for Americans not yet even born."

"Many Democrats," he said, view the war as "a political opportunity," while Republicans view it as "a political burden." But it is neither, he said. It is not a political question to be poll-tested but a challenge that bears on our continuance as a great nation. We must stay and fight and win.

"It may be standard-setting," the Hotline said of the remarks the next day, "perhaps the most powerful plea a war supporter has . . . sent to the American people since the troop surge began. Has any other presidential candidate written a speech to persuade--importune--an audience to change their minds?"

You can agree or disagree with Mr. McCain, but where he stands is clear--and clarity these days, from our candidates, feels like a gift. As does certitude. He isn't running from the war but owning it. A political rival might say, "He has no choice." But there's always a choice.

My larger point, however, is that he sounded like a serious man addressing a serious issue in a serious way. This makes him at the moment stand out. ...

***

In case you didn't make it by yesterday:

  • 2007.04.12 Politics Roundup
    • LAT poll: Rudy 29, Fred! 15, McCain 12
    • LA Times Poll: Fred Gains As McCain Drops Back
    • There is no Fred Thompson Boulevard
    • 5 in the morning
    • Hoffa: We'll "Blow Up" Denver For Dem Convention
    • Thompson and Gingrich; apples and oranges
    • McCain Unbound
    • Fun Facts About The 110th Congress

Contributed by Bill Faith on April 13, 2007 at 01:33 AM in Hillary Clinton, John McCain-Feingold, Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Thursday, 05 April 2007
 

The Welcoming Void
-- Rudy stands by support for public funding of abortions

The Welcoming Void
Ed Morrissey

The New York Sun reports that recent polling has encouraged Fred Thompson to seriously consider a run for the Republican Presidential nomination. Jim Geraghty, the blogger behind NRO's HillarySpot, says that Thompson fills a void left by the unexpected loss of George Allen in last year's midterm elections:

When George Allen fell to Jim Webb in the Virginia Senate race, it opened up a slot in the upcoming Republican presidential primary: the role of the reliable longtime lawmaker who has no serious disagreements with the conservatives who make up the party's base.

That slot is moving closer to being filled by a former senator of Tennessee, Fred Thompson. The potential candidate is about "50–50" on running "because the polls have caught his eye," a source close to Mr. Thompson told National Review. ...

With Rudy Giuliani defending federal funding of abortions, that opening may have widened considerably in the last 24 hours.

***

Video: Rudy stands by support for public funding of abortions; Update: McCain looks “tired and … cranky,” says Rudy
Allahpundit

He took that position in 1989 and by god he’s sticking to it. I’ve already written about his strategy in this vein before. Suffice it to say, it’s too late for him to flip-flop convincingly, and so, with his two rivals looking squishy in their own commitment to social issues, he figures he might as well position himself as a man of his word who’ll stand on principle. Because if he’s willing to do that for principles conservatives don’t like, he’s probably also willing to do it for principles that they do.

More interesting than the abortion comments is what he says at the end in response to the question about Peter Pace’s opinion of gays. Is he suggesting that it’s inappropriate, at least for Christians, to make personal moral judgments? Or just inappropriate for Christian politicians?

Needless to say, this isn’t going to hurt him in California. Click the image to watch.

Update: Captain Ed says it’s game over for Rudy.

Update: John Dickerson of Slate was in New Hampshire on Monday for a Rudy house party: ...

***

Zogby N.H. poll: McCain 25, Giuliani 19, Romney … 25; Update: Rudy to social cons — love me for who I am
Allahpundit

It’s Zogby so the results are presumptively wrong, but compare them to the RCP numbers for New Hampshire and you’ll see they aren’t that wrong. Mitt’s the local boy up there and he’s riding a wave of good buzz right now from his fundraising numbers. He was only six points off the lead in the American Research Group poll conducted last month. Given Z’s usual margin of error, figure he trails McCain in reality by five points or so at the moment.

Emphasis on “at the moment.” Because he’s gone and said something that further damages his credibility as a supposedly committed, red meat conservative.

Ace thinks Rudy finished himself off yesterday with his abortion remarks, but this wish list from Gallup makes me wonder: ...

***

Romney calls himself a longtime hunter 

BOSTON - In boasting about his lifelong experience as a hunter, Mitt Romney may have shot himself in the foot.

The Republican presidential contender has told audiences on several occasions, most recently this week in gun-savvy — and early voting — New Hampshire, that he has been a longtime hunter. But it turns out he has been on only two hunting trips.

Critics said it was the latest example of a White House aspirant willing to say anything to reach the Oval Office. ...

***

Giuliani On Federally-Funded Abortions, Take 3
Ed Morrissey

It appears that Rudy Giuliani, intelligent man that he is, understands the damage he did to his efforts to connect with conservatives in his CNN interview yesterday. As Kathryn Jean Lopez posted at The Corner, Giuliani has started to climb down from his support of funding abortions with tax dollars: ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on April 5, 2007 at 05:05 PM in Fred Thompson, Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Friday, 23 March 2007
 

Boomer: Go Rudy!!!

I guess when Big Sister's Thought Police come for Boomer they might as well take me too:

Rudy has a chance to save the U.S. of A.  Here is his last chance.  Does he have the ballz to complete the mission? 

Alas, t'will never come to pass. 

After all, this is humor.  But in reality it's not humorous to me.  Evil thoughts wander about in my mind.  I keep hearing the words, "PUSH, PUSH!!!"

Not my moment in time to be nice.

-- Boomer

Contributed by Bill Faith on March 23, 2007 at 12:33 AM in Hillary Clinton, Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Wednesday, 07 February 2007
 

Republicans Want To Like Rudy, If They Can
Ed Morrissey

John Podhoretz explains the surprising popularity of Rudy Giuliani in the early stages of the 2008 presidential primary campaign, writing that Republicans want to like Rudy -- if he'll let them. In his New York Post column, Podhoretz notes more than a few of the hurdles that Giuliani faces, but insists that neither conservatives nor Giuliani want to go to war over them:

Republicans not only like Rudy, they want to like him. Conservative Republicans want to like him. Socially conservative Republicans want to like him.

In this respect, he represents a momentous change from prior candidates hailing from outside the party's socially conservative wing.

Past "liberal" GOP candidates and would-be candidates have sought the nomination by taking strong stands counter to the views of the party's conservative base ...

Rudy, by contrast, is trying to convince social conservatives that he's their friend. They disagree on certain matters, he'll say, but on the key issue of our time - the struggle of the West against Islamic extremism - they'll never have a better or more staunch ally and leader.

And while his personal views on some issues may differ from theirs, he'll appoint judges in the manner of Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts and Samuel Alito - which is, in the end, most of what a president can do to support the ideas in which social conservatives deeply believe.

Podhoretz may have provided the key element of Giuliani's broad appeal within the GOP. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on February 7, 2007 at 01:56 PM in Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Monday, 05 February 2007
 

Rudy's In (Updated with video and transcript links)

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani
Files Candidacy Statement for 2008 Race

WASHINGTON —  Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor whose popularity soared after his response to the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, moved closer to a full-fledged campaign for the Republican presidential nomination on Monday.

In a sign that he's serious about running for the White House, the two-term mayor was filing a so-called "statement of candidacy" with the Federal Election Commission. In the process, he was eliminating the phrase "testing the waters" from earlier paperwork establishing his exploratory committee, said an official close to Giuliani's campaign.

• Watch an exclusive interview with Giuliani on FOX News' Hannity & Colmes tonight at 9 p.m. ET.

The steps Monday put Giuliani on the same level, legally, as McCain and Romney, the other two top-tier GOP candidates who have formed regular exploratory committees and filed statements of candidacy. ...

***

Video: Rudy Giuliani discusses candidacy on H&C

***

Rudy's In, Mostly
Ed Morrissey

Rudy Giuliani ended most of the speculation by amending his exploratory committee papers today to include a "statement of candidacy". It moves him closer to the eventual commitment to run, but Giuliani all but made that tonight on Hannity & Colmes on Fox News Channel: ...

Via Rudy's campaign staff, I have the entire transcript in the extended entry.

Contributed by Bill Faith on February 5, 2007 at 02:25 PM in Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Saturday, 03 February 2007
 

Rudy On Judges
Ed Morrissey

Given the more liberal tendencies of Rudy Giuliani on abortion and guns, conservatives have expressed serious misgivings about his run for the nomination. However, the main effect that a President can have on these issues involves his or her outlook on the judiciary. The federal court system has been the main battleground for both issues, with Roe specifically precluding any kind of legislative action. Court nominations have become one of the essential considerations for presidential contenders -- and it may be more important for Giuliani than any other Republican candidate.

Giuliani has hinted that he would nominate jurists in the mold of Antonin Scalia and John Roberts. Today, at a visit with the South Carolina GOP Executive Committee, an audience member pressed him for his position. His campaign office has supplied us with the transcript of his answer:

On the Federal judiciary I would want judges who are strict constructionists because I am. I'm a lawyer. I've argued cases in the Supreme Court. I've argued cases in the Court of Appeals in different parts of the country. I have a very, very strong view that for this country to work, for our freedoms to be protected, judges have to interpret not invent the Constitution. Otherwise you end up, when judges invent the constitution, with your liberties being hurt. Because legislatures get to make those decisions and the legislature in South Carolina might make that decision one way and the legislature in California a different one. And that's part of our freedom and when that's taken away from you that's terrible.  ...

Someone else I could feel not too bad about. Hunter/Giuliani '08?

Contributed by Bill Faith on February 3, 2007 at 06:37 PM in Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack


Thursday, 07 December 2006
 

Giuliani, McCain Reject Israel-Iraq Linkage
Ed Morrissey

At least two presidential aspiranta have publicly opposed the Iraq Study Group and its linkage of the situation in Iraq with the Palestinian conflict. Rudy Giuliani called some of the ISG's recommendations "useful", but told Dennis Prager that leaving Iraq would be a "terrible mistake", while John McCain scotched the notion of a regional conference dominated by two terror-supporting states:

"The idea of leaving Iraq, I think, is a terrible mistake," the former mayor said. The group's report, however, stresses that America should not make an "open-ended" commitment of troops and links the presence of troops to milestones met by the Iraqi government.

Mr. Giuliani also rejected the panel's recommendation that America tie the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian Arab conflict to stabilizing Iraq. ...

John McCain offered a less-certain assessment of the Iraq-Israel link, calling it "tenuous at best". He also objected to the timeline offered by the Iraq Study Group. The 2008 deadline only encourages Iraqis to move towards the militias that will endure after an American withdrawal rather than to remain firm and fight the sectarian forces in order to establish authority under their representative government. McCain also rejected the notion of a regional conference with Iran and Syria, calling the divergence of interests between those countries and the US "unlikely to change under the current regimes".

Giuliani also rejected James Baker's efforts to get the panel's recommendations adoped in toto, a peculiar demand that arises these days from such blue-ribbon committees. ...

Contributed by Bill Faith on December 7, 2006 at 11:42 AM in Iraq, Islamism Delenda Est, Politics, Rudy Giuliani | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack