Small Town Veteran

Baby boomer, nerdy kid, Viet Nam veteran, engineer, daddy, grandpa.
Politically incorrect.  Proud anti-idiotarian

"For those who have fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know."


"May no soldier
go unloved."

Islamism
Delenda Est!

Death before
dhimmitude

 


(Membership transferred
to Bill's Bites)



Aztlanism
Delenda Est!

Some links I like to keep handy at all times


Other
Worthy Sites

Bill's World
Heather
Brandi Jean
Lt. Robbie

Previous List Random Join Next Viper's Vietnam Veteran Page
SiteRing by Bravenet.com

Please support Soldiers' Angels and Project Valour-IT


« "Who Can Check the President?"
Main
72 Hours: Who Could Ask For More? »


2006.01.08

al-WaPo issue's feeble "correction," Roggio responds

(Click here, here and here for some background.)


The Easy Way
The Washington Post makes simple corrections but does not address the real issues
By Bill Roggio

The Washington Post has printed corrections to the article Bloggers, Money Now Weapons in Information War - U.S. Recruits Advocates to the Front, Pays Iraqi TV Stations for Coverage:

A Dec. 26 article misstated the accreditation of Web journalist Bill Roggio when he was embedded with U.S. Marines in Iraq. He was accredited by the Weekly Standard. The article said that Roggio was embedded with the Marines at the time of publication, but Roggio had returned to the United States. The article also described Roggio as a retired soldier; he served four years on active duty and two years with the National Guard, which is short of the 20-year minimum for retirement.

The Washington Post has rightly corrected the record on the three minor factual errors, but has chosen to ignore the larger issues: how was my media accreditation any different from that of any other reporter who has been embedded, including those at The Washington Post; and why was my reporting “folded… into a story about military propaganda”, ...

[Read the whole thing here.]


***

See also: Correcting a fact and not the intent

Posted by Bill Faith on January 8, 2006 at 04:56 PM | Permalink


TrackBack


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference al-WaPo issue's feeble "correction," Roggio responds:



Comments


Note: I hate to have to do it but I'm turning on comment and trackback moderation. If you post a legitimate trackback or comment I'll do my best not to be too slow about approving it. If the only reason you're here is to advertise your porn, music, or penis enhancement site you can kiss my sweet ass.



Post a comment