Small Town Veteran

Baby boomer, nerdy kid, Viet Nam veteran, engineer, daddy, grandpa.
Politically incorrect.  Proud anti-idiotarian

"For those who have fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know."


"May no soldier
go unloved."

Islamism
Delenda Est!

Death before
dhimmitude
 


(Membership transferred
to Bill's Bites)



Aztlanism
Delenda Est!

Some links I like to keep handy at all times

Other
Worthy Sites

Bill's World
Heather
Brandi Jean
Lt. Robbie

Previous List Random Join Next Viper's Vietnam Veteran Page
SiteRing by Bravenet.com

Please support Soldiers' Angels and Project Valour-IT

« A soldier. A hearse. A hero.
Main
Canadian bomb plot linked to other countries? »

2006.06.03

More proof the MSM's on the other side

Revisionist history in Haditha and Ishaqi

Michelle on the former, Greyhawk on the latter.

How many Iraqis will be killed in the next few weeks and months by terrorists eager to make it look like American troops have perpetrated another massacre?

How many gullible media outlets will be only too eager to believe them?

[Read on.]

Posted by Bill Faith on June 3, 2006 at 07:40 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More proof the MSM's on the other side:

Comments

Note: I hate to have to do it but I'm turning on comment and trackback moderation. If you post a legitimate trackback or comment I'll do my best not to be too slow about approving it. If the only reason you're here is to advertise your porn, music, or penis enhancement site you can kiss my sweet ass.

Oh yeah, The Times is a real pinko moonbat paper. Those Murdoch ones always are, just like the NY Post and Fox News. So they used an old photo to illustrate something - big deal. Essentially - and sadly - it looks like what they were inaccurately documenting was true, and innocents died at Haditha. But don't go ranting on about 'msm bias' when as far as the Times is concerned, its complete bullshit. In case you thought otherwise, it is not related to the NY Times, and its comment and editorial section has been unstinting in its continued - if qualified - support for the war in Iraq. If you doubt me on this, check their editorial from yesterday, or the webblogs of among others, Gerard Baker, Stephen Pollard, Oliver Kamm and David Aaronvitch. The US government is lucky to have such eloquent adovocates in the British press. Its deranged reactionaries such as that Malkin woman that give conservative Americans a bad name.

Posted by: James | Jun 7, 2006 5:29:38 AM

Post a comment